<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Assessing Clustering Tendency	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/</link>
	<description>Data Mining and Statistics for Decision Support</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:11:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hongxu Yan		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-21083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hongxu Yan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-21083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice blog!Learn a lot and thanks a lot!
But I still have no idea about how to perform mixed data to obtain the Hopskin statistic.I will really appreciate ,if you can reply.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog!Learn a lot and thanks a lot!<br />
But I still have no idea about how to perform mixed data to obtain the Hopskin statistic.I will really appreciate ,if you can reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KL		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-3106</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 06:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-3106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-3105&quot;&gt;kassambara&lt;/a&gt;.

Very good. Thanks again! I&#039;m sure future visitors to this page will be grateful for the clarification.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-3105">kassambara</a>.</p>
<p>Very good. Thanks again! I&#8217;m sure future visitors to this page will be grateful for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kassambara		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-3105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kassambara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 19:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-3105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-3098&quot;&gt;KL&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for your feedback. I updated my previous comment. It is the latest developmental version of factoextra that returns H instead of 1-H (https://github.com/kassambara/factoextra/blob/master/NEWS.md).

You can install it as follow:

&lt;pre class = &quot;r_code&quot;&gt;
if(!require(devtools)) install.packages(&quot;devtools&quot;)
devtools::install_github(&quot;kassambara/factoextra&quot;)
&lt;/pre&gt;

I&#039;m submitting it to CRAN now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-3098">KL</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for your feedback. I updated my previous comment. It is the latest developmental version of factoextra that returns H instead of 1-H (<a href="https://github.com/kassambara/factoextra/blob/master/NEWS.md" rel="nofollow ugc">https://github.com/kassambara/factoextra/blob/master/NEWS.md</a>).</p>
<p>You can install it as follow:</p>
<pre class = "r_code">
if(!require(devtools)) install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("kassambara/factoextra")
</pre>
<p>I&#8217;m submitting it to CRAN now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KL		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-3098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 08:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-3098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Kassambara,

Thanks for producing so much useful content! Your website is great.

However, you said in a comment here that the get_clust_tendency() function in version 1.0.5 of &#039;factoextra&#039; generates H, rather than 1 - H. This is incorrect, as far as I can tell, because I am using &#039;factoextra&#039; version 1.0.5, and get output values from get_clust_tendency() which are virtually identical to the output of the hopkins() function from &#039;clustertend&#039; (which, as you know, outputs 1 - H). I have tested this with different datasets, and it seems the get_clust_tendency() function in version 1.0.5 of &#039;factoextra&#039; generates 1 - H, not H.

Please consider providing a proper explanation in the main text of this tutorial, of when and how the get_clust_tendency() function from &#039;factoextra&#039; was changed.

Many people rely on the content of your website, and not providing a proper explanation has resulted in quite a lot of confusion, as you can see from the comments here and discussions elsewhere too: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/332651/validating-cluster-tendency-using-hopkins-statistic

Many thanks again for the useful content!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kassambara,</p>
<p>Thanks for producing so much useful content! Your website is great.</p>
<p>However, you said in a comment here that the get_clust_tendency() function in version 1.0.5 of &#8216;factoextra&#8217; generates H, rather than 1 &#8211; H. This is incorrect, as far as I can tell, because I am using &#8216;factoextra&#8217; version 1.0.5, and get output values from get_clust_tendency() which are virtually identical to the output of the hopkins() function from &#8216;clustertend&#8217; (which, as you know, outputs 1 &#8211; H). I have tested this with different datasets, and it seems the get_clust_tendency() function in version 1.0.5 of &#8216;factoextra&#8217; generates 1 &#8211; H, not H.</p>
<p>Please consider providing a proper explanation in the main text of this tutorial, of when and how the get_clust_tendency() function from &#8216;factoextra&#8217; was changed.</p>
<p>Many people rely on the content of your website, and not providing a proper explanation has resulted in quite a lot of confusion, as you can see from the comments here and discussions elsewhere too: <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/332651/validating-cluster-tendency-using-hopkins-statistic" rel="nofollow ugc">https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/332651/validating-cluster-tendency-using-hopkins-statistic</a></p>
<p>Many thanks again for the useful content!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Serkan Korkmaz		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-2500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serkan Korkmaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-2500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1728&quot;&gt;Mark Bergenholtz&lt;/a&gt;.

If  v.1.0.5 and beyond computes H, then ;

res = get_clust_tendency(
  data = data,
  n = nrow(data)-1,
  graph = F
)

res$hopkins_stat = 0.1815219

------

Here data is the standardised Iris dataset. How do we proceed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1728">Mark Bergenholtz</a>.</p>
<p>If  v.1.0.5 and beyond computes H, then ;</p>
<p>res = get_clust_tendency(<br />
  data = data,<br />
  n = nrow(data)-1,<br />
  graph = F<br />
)</p>
<p>res$hopkins_stat = 0.1815219</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Here data is the standardised Iris dataset. How do we proceed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ranjit Singh		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-2446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranjit Singh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 07:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-2446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1495&quot;&gt;kassambara&lt;/a&gt;.

https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/factoextra/factoextra.pdf

it is written below 0.5 is highly clusterable
but in this it is 0.8
how it is highly clusterable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1495">kassambara</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/factoextra/factoextra.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/factoextra/factoextra.pdf</a></p>
<p>it is written below 0.5 is highly clusterable<br />
but in this it is 0.8<br />
how it is highly clusterable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kassambara		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kassambara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 19:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-1983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1728&quot;&gt;Mark Bergenholtz&lt;/a&gt;.

Please make sure you have the latest developmental version of factoextra, which computes H. 

You can install it as follow:

&lt;pre class=&quot;r_code&quot;&gt;
if(!require(devtools)) install.packages(&quot;devtools&quot;)
devtools::install_github(&quot;kassambara/factoextra&quot;)
&lt;/pre&gt;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1728">Mark Bergenholtz</a>.</p>
<p>Please make sure you have the latest developmental version of factoextra, which computes H. </p>
<p>You can install it as follow:</p>
<pre class="r_code">
if(!require(devtools)) install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("kassambara/factoextra")
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Omar		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 13:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-1982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1728&quot;&gt;Mark Bergenholtz&lt;/a&gt;.

I am also questioning if the get_clust_tendency from devtools::install_github(&quot;kassambara/factoextra&quot;) produces 1-H instead of H. 

There is also a discussion here: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/332651/validating-cluster-tendency-using-hopkins-statistic

Can the author please confirm?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1728">Mark Bergenholtz</a>.</p>
<p>I am also questioning if the get_clust_tendency from devtools::install_github(&#8220;kassambara/factoextra&#8221;) produces 1-H instead of H. </p>
<p>There is also a discussion here: <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/332651/validating-cluster-tendency-using-hopkins-statistic" rel="nofollow ugc">https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/332651/validating-cluster-tendency-using-hopkins-statistic</a></p>
<p>Can the author please confirm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kassambara		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kassambara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-1885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1875&quot;&gt;shamidou&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi,

R is asking if you want to update old packages. Type 20 in R console to ignore these updates and try.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1875">shamidou</a>.</p>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>R is asking if you want to update old packages. Type 20 in R console to ignore these updates and try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shamidou		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/assessing-clustering-tendency/#comment-1875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shamidou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?post_type=dt_lessons&#038;p=8060#comment-1875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello,
I am trying to install &#039;facoextra&#039; thru devtools and github. it is showing several packages shown below. Which one to choose?
Regards,
 1:   assertthat (0.2.0  -&#062; 0.2.1 ) [CRAN]   2:   cli        (1.0.1  -&#062; 1.1.0 ) [CRAN]
 3:   clipr      (0.5.0  -&#062; 0.6.0 ) [CRAN]   4:   colorspace (1.4-0  -&#062; 1.4-1 ) [CRAN]
 5:   data.table (1.12.0 -&#062; 1.12.2) [CRAN]   6:   ggplot2    (3.1.0  -&#062; 3.1.1 ) [CRAN]
 7:   glue       (1.3.0  -&#062; 1.3.1 ) [CRAN]   8:   gtable     (0.2.0  -&#062; 0.3.0 ) [CRAN]
 9:   lazyeval   (0.2.1  -&#062; 0.2.2 ) [CRAN]  10:   lme4       (1.1-20 -&#062; 1.1-21) [CRAN]
11:   maptools   (0.9-4  -&#062; 0.9-5 ) [CRAN]  12:   purrr      (0.3.0  -&#062; 0.3.2 ) [CRAN]
13:   Rcpp       (1.0.0  -&#062; 1.0.1 ) [CRAN]  14:   readxl     (1.3.0  -&#062; 1.3.1 ) [CRAN]
15:   rlang      (0.3.1  -&#062; 0.3.4 ) [CRAN]  16:   stringi    (1.3.1  -&#062; 1.4.3 ) [CRAN]
17:   tibble     (2.0.1  -&#062; 2.1.1 ) [CRAN]  18:   CRAN packages only                  
19:   All                                   20:   None]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I am trying to install &#8216;facoextra&#8217; thru devtools and github. it is showing several packages shown below. Which one to choose?<br />
Regards,<br />
 1:   assertthat (0.2.0  -&gt; 0.2.1 ) [CRAN]   2:   cli        (1.0.1  -&gt; 1.1.0 ) [CRAN]<br />
 3:   clipr      (0.5.0  -&gt; 0.6.0 ) [CRAN]   4:   colorspace (1.4-0  -&gt; 1.4-1 ) [CRAN]<br />
 5:   data.table (1.12.0 -&gt; 1.12.2) [CRAN]   6:   ggplot2    (3.1.0  -&gt; 3.1.1 ) [CRAN]<br />
 7:   glue       (1.3.0  -&gt; 1.3.1 ) [CRAN]   8:   gtable     (0.2.0  -&gt; 0.3.0 ) [CRAN]<br />
 9:   lazyeval   (0.2.1  -&gt; 0.2.2 ) [CRAN]  10:   lme4       (1.1-20 -&gt; 1.1-21) [CRAN]<br />
11:   maptools   (0.9-4  -&gt; 0.9-5 ) [CRAN]  12:   purrr      (0.3.0  -&gt; 0.3.2 ) [CRAN]<br />
13:   Rcpp       (1.0.0  -&gt; 1.0.1 ) [CRAN]  14:   readxl     (1.3.0  -&gt; 1.3.1 ) [CRAN]<br />
15:   rlang      (0.3.1  -&gt; 0.3.4 ) [CRAN]  16:   stringi    (1.3.1  -&gt; 1.4.3 ) [CRAN]<br />
17:   tibble     (2.0.1  -&gt; 2.1.1 ) [CRAN]  18:   CRAN packages only<br />
19:   All                                   20:   None</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 107/184 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching 37/57 queries in 0.023 seconds using APC

Served from: www.datanovia.com @ 2025-07-23 19:03:01 by W3 Total Cache
-->