<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to Perform T-test for Multiple Variables in R: Pairwise Group Comparisons	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/</link>
	<description>Data Mining and Statistics for Decision Support</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gene		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/#comment-20497</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?p=15430#comment-20497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/#comment-20496&quot;&gt;kassambara&lt;/a&gt;.

I got it! Thank you very much for your answer!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/#comment-20496">kassambara</a>.</p>
<p>I got it! Thank you very much for your answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kassambara		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/#comment-20496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kassambara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 06:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?p=15430#comment-20496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/#comment-20492&quot;&gt;Gene&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for the positive feedback!

If you have multiple groups, then I would go with ANOVA then post-hoc test (if ANOVA is significant). 

Every time you conduct a t-test there is a chance that you will make a Type I error (i.e., false positive finding). This error is usually 5%. By running two t-tests on the same data you will have increased your chance of &quot;making a mistake&quot; to 10%. Three t-tests would be about 15% and so on. These are unacceptable errors. An ANOVA controls for these errors so that the Type I error remains at 5% and you can be more confident that any statistically significant result you find is not just running lots of tests.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/#comment-20492">Gene</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for the positive feedback!</p>
<p>If you have multiple groups, then I would go with ANOVA then post-hoc test (if ANOVA is significant). </p>
<p>Every time you conduct a t-test there is a chance that you will make a Type I error (i.e., false positive finding). This error is usually 5%. By running two t-tests on the same data you will have increased your chance of &#8220;making a mistake&#8221; to 10%. Three t-tests would be about 15% and so on. These are unacceptable errors. An ANOVA controls for these errors so that the Type I error remains at 5% and you can be more confident that any statistically significant result you find is not just running lots of tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gene		</title>
		<link>https://www.datanovia.com/en/blog/how-to-perform-t-test-for-multiple-variables-in-r-pairwise-group-comparisons/#comment-20492</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 03:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.datanovia.com/en/?p=15430#comment-20492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi! Excellent tutorial website! I saw a discussion at another site saying that before running a pairwise t-test, an ANOVA test should be performed first. It is like the pairwise t-test is a Post hoc test. I am wondering, can I directly analyze my data by pairwise t-test without running an ANOVA?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Excellent tutorial website! I saw a discussion at another site saying that before running a pairwise t-test, an ANOVA test should be performed first. It is like the pairwise t-test is a Post hoc test. I am wondering, can I directly analyze my data by pairwise t-test without running an ANOVA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 107/181 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching 34/66 queries in 0.460 seconds using APC

Served from: www.datanovia.com @ 2025-08-02 00:11:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->